Friday, June 12, 2020



Black Lives Matter is a collectivist oriented organisation which is the very opposite to both individualism and Christianity.

<<<We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.

We foster a queer‐affirming network. When we gather, we do so with the intention of freeing ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking, or rather, the belief that all in the world are heterosexual (unless s/he or they disclose otherwise).

We cultivate an intergenerational and communal network free from ageism. We believe that all people, regardless of age, show up with the capacity to lead and learn.>>>

Their promotion of the destruction of the family serves to enhance the value of the "collective" over and above that of individual family units. The reason for this is because "family loyalty" tends to undermine a "collective loyalty" to the group or state. Such rhetoric is extensively written about in marxist and socialist writings and it is even alluded to in various occult writings where the "All" has preeminence over the individual (marxism/socialism/collectivism is rooted in occult philosophy).

It is for this same reason that Black Lives Matter affirms and promotes the "transgender" and "homosexual" movements, for they are an attack on traditional family structure as well as biblical and Christian morality.

A collectivist entity can only thrive when loyalty is FIRST to the collective whereupon everything else thus has become subject to that first loyalty. This is why collectivist systems are necessarily totalitarian for each individual is viewed more as a "cell" of a larger "organism." There is no such thing as individual rights under collectivism, only group or collective rights.

Dividing society into "group identities" also serves to undermine individual worth or value, value becomes more associated with one being "part of the group.:"

<<<We embody and practice justice, liberation, and peace in our engagements with one another.>>>

"Justice, liberation and peace" is actually a wishy-washy "anything goes" moral relativist position where no value really challenges another. Thus people unify into what is basically a "believe in nothing, go along to get along" herd grouping. The people, lacking any real firm principled foundation, are thus very easily manipulated by those whom would lead them. Critical thinking has been replaced with emotionalism and a blind loyalty to the group.

Black Lives Matter has NOTHING to do with race or injustice, it merely USES race and injustice as a means to recruit and propagandise extremely naive people into supporting collectivism.

Collectivism is ultimately where the FEW rule over and decide for the MANY. Individualism is where the MANY rule and decide for themselves.

Individualism ONLY works when a majority of the people are moral, virtuous and upright for then they are "self-governed" which is the antidote to disharmony and destruction in society. When people are immoral and act like animals then they are like wild beasts in waiting to be caged for their own good.

This is why a society that rejects God, whom is love, will eventually experience totalitarianism. The consequences of immorality bring disharmony and destruction to society and the only solution without love and self-control is tyranny by men.


Black Lives Matter is a subversive communist front.


I quote...

<<<We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.>>>

One of Black Lives Matter's stated purposes is to disrupt the nuclear family. The nuclear family is defined as a family consisting of two parents (mother and father) and one or more children. BLM promotes the disruption of the nuclear family in favour of the group collective which they call the "extended family", ie. the "community."

The Communist Manifest teaches that "the dissolution of the old ideas keeps even pace with the dissolution of the old conditions of existence" in the context that "bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting" as it relates, in their view, to "the action of Modern Industry" (ie. capitalism). Which is why the nuclear family must be undermined in that, "the Communists have not invented the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class." In other words, the Communist central planners MUST destroy the family because it undermines collectivist loyalty.

Don't believe the last paragraph?

The above quotes are taken directly from the Communist Manifesto...

Why would Black Lives Matter have a stated goal of "disrupting the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure" in favour of "extended families and villages that COLLECTIVELY care for one another, ESPECIALLY THE CHILDREN"?

It's because collectivist philosophy is ALWAYS premised upon the "group" and not the individual. They view society as one big organism with each individual as a "cell" in that organism. Under this way of thinking, all the "cells" must all be working for the benefit of the "whole" and that requires a re-ordering of society in a top down authoritarian approach.

This is why organisations like Black Lives Matter always promote an increase in the regulation and managing of society by government. One of their stated demands is...

<<<We demand economic justice for all and a reconstruction of the economy to ensure Black communities have collective ownership, not merely access.>>>

Plank 1 on their demand for Economic Justice is...

<<<A progressive restructuring of tax codes at the local, state, and federal levels to ensure a radical and sustainable redistribution of wealth.>>>

A basic tenet of communism is the redistribution of wealth as opposed to upholding the value of private property. The United States was established upon the principle the protection of life, liberty and property. Why do these people want to undermine the right to private property by implementing the communist principle of redistributing that property?

Plank 2 on their demand for Economic Justice states...

<<<Federal and state job programs that specifically target the most economically marginalized Black people, and compensation for those involved in the care economy. Job programs must provide a living wage and encourage support for local workers centers, unions, and Black-owned businesses which are accountable to the community.>>>

They first divide people into a group based on race (ie. black people) and then demand that it is the governments task to provide both compensation and job programs for this particular group. Government does not produce anything, it can only take from one and give to another. They are demanding that the government not only control wealth and jobs but implement policies based on race. That's both racism and communism. One can go on down the list and read all the flowery language about "ending exploitation" and "providing for the collective" and "protections for everyone," and if one is familiar with the Communist Manifesto one will see the exact same language and sentiment being utilised.

Such rhetoric easily fools the naive and historically ignorant. It's so sad to see millions of young people unwittingly supporting communist philosophy in 2020. Communism resulted in the deaths of hundreds of millions of people in the 20th Century. Those whom objected to authoritarian government had to either be eliminated or re-educated for the good of the whole and multitudes were imprisoned and murdered. Many also died as a result of the misallocation of resources due to the failure of authoritarian economic central planning.

Is this what is coming to the United States? History clearly demonstrates that power kills and absolute power kills absolutely.


Is the United States the "Land of the Free and Home of the Brave" anymore? Or is it fast becoming the "Land of the Authoritarian telling everyone what to do and Home of the fearfully scared, a people afraid stand upon their own two feet and make their own decisions in life?"

No comments:

Post a Comment